今年１月２１日、米共和党のルビオ上院議員に媚びを売る、うすら馬鹿安倍晋三。（クリック拡大して、安倍の表情をジックリご覧あれ）Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe welcomes US Sen., Marco Rubio of Florida at his residence.
一瞬の仕草に出る安倍の正体 （政府ＴＶ）
安倍晋三は朝鮮カルト 統一協会のお友だち。Shinzo Abe is a friend of Moonie, Cult Unification Church. ↓クリックすると拡大します。（更にサイズ大）
気象庁の震央分布図（→頁アーカイブ）、こんな所で原発なんて危険きわまりない（石橋克彦氏、地震学）。汚染水ダダ漏れだからオリンピック開催もふさわしくない。（ Japan is situated in a volcanic zone on the Pacific Ring of Fire. It's also located near major tectonic plate boundaries, where's an un-wise place for 54 reactors. and now Osensui is not under control. So Japan and Tokyo is Unworthy of 2020 Olympic Games. ）。震央分布図がある新頁。
Japanese political veteran Ichiro Ozawa speaks at a ceremony to launch his new party in Tokyo in this July 11, 2012 file photo. Credit: Reuters/Issei Kato
(Reuters) - When Prime Minister Shinzo Abe loosened the limits of Japan's pacifist constitution to drop a ban on its military fighting overseas, many experts said it was a step towards becoming a "normal country" able to do more in its own defence.
But Ichiro Ozawa, a one-time ruling party kingmaker who coined the phrase two decades ago, says Abe's policy is fundamentally different and risks leading Japan down a path with dangerous echoes of pre-war militarism.
Abe's cabinet took a step away from Japan's post-World War Two pacifism this month by dropping a ban on exercising the right of "collective self-defence", or aiding a friendly country under attack. That prohibition has kept troops from fighting abroad since 1945.
Ozawa used the phrase "normal country" in his 1994 book, "Blueprint for a New Japan", written after the 1990-1991 Gulf War. The constitution's constraints then limited Japan's contribution to the U.N.-backed military mission to providing cash.
Many policy-makers were embarrassed when the failure to put boots on the ground was derided abroad as "chequebook diplomacy".
"His ideas are different from the 'normal country' of which I spoke," Ozawa, 72, told Reuters in an interview.
"Mr. Abe’s concept is for Japan to have a sort of pre-war-style, great power military and economy - a kind of pre-war revival," he said.
"He is a good person, but I feel there is something rather dangerous about his political views and ideals as a top leader."
FOUR DECADES
Ozawa has been a fixture in Japanese politics for four decades.
A heavyweight in the long-ruling Liberal Democratic Party, now headed by Abe, he bolted the LDP in 1993 and led a succession of opposition parties.
These included the Democratic Party of Japan, which took over from the LDP in a 2009 landslide poll, but was ousted when Abe surged back to power in 2012. Ozawa is now leader of the small opposition People's Life Party.
Abe's government - which avoids using the term "normal country" - has rejected suggestions by China and some domestic critics that it aims to revive pre-war style militarism.
Proponents say the policy shift, which revises a longstanding interpretation of the constitution's pacifist Article 9, is vital for Japan to cope with a tough security environment, including the rise of an increasingly assertive China and an unpredictable North Korea.
Ozawa, however, has long argued that the constitution limits Japan's military participation in conflicts not directly related to Japan to missions sanctioned by the United Nations.
Allowing participation in operations with allies in other conflicts not directly tied to Japan's defence would require amending the constitution, he says.
"The cabinet can adopt whatever resolution it likes, but there is no scope for reinterpretation," Ozawa said. "To call for a revision of Article 9 would be logical, and that is what a proper statesman should do."
As DPJ leader in 2007, Ozawa opposed a law allowing Japan to refuel foreign ships taking part in U.S.-led operations in Afghanistan, one of the factors that forced Abe to resign abruptly in his first year-long term as premier.
He said the political tide that made him seem right-wing 20 years ago had shifted so much that he now comes across as leftist.
"In the past, I was called right-wing, now they call me left-wing. I have not changed at all," he said.
(Additional reporting by Yuko Yoshikawa and Minami Funakoshi; Editing by Ron Popeski)
６、 CCTVと言うのは中国中央電視台（China Central Television） Man burns himself in Tokyo in protest 43秒 CCTV News https://youtu.be/IR_WB9YFCEg
2014/06/29 に公開
概要：China's Xinhua News Agency is reporting that a man is badly injured after burning himself on Sunday at the crowded Shinjuku train station in Japan's capital Tokyo.
2014年7月1日は自衛隊創立の60周年であるが、戦後日本史の分岐点として歴史に残ることになるだろう―安倍が民主主義をハイジャックした21世紀の「屈辱の日A Day of Infamy」（注）として。それを安倍は9条と日本の戦後平和主義秩序を無節操な方法で放棄することによって、そして憲法規定の手続きを踏む度胸もなく専断によって達成したのだ。人々は安倍を恐れているが、それ以上に安倍は人々を恐れている。
注： A Day of Infamy - 1941年12月7日の日本の真珠湾攻撃についてルーズベルト大統領（当時）が使った言葉。2001年9月11日の同時多発テロのときも使われた。
ジェフ・キングストン テンプル大学日本校のアジア研究学科ディレクター、『アジア太平洋ジャーナル：ジャパン・フォーカス』エディター。Natural Disaster and Nuclear Crisis in Japan: Response and Recovery after Japan's 311, Rougledge 2012 の編者、Contemporary Japan (2nd Edition), London: Wiley 2013 の著者。
Last week a man set himself on fire next to Shinjuku Station to reportedly protest Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s bid to lift constitutional constraints on Japan’s military forces. It was a gruesome spectacle captured on numerous smartphone videos and disseminated on social media. Good thing because the mainstream media practically ignored the most extraordinary act of political protest in the quarter century that I have lived in Japan. NHK news didn’t even mention the event, apparently playing by Pyongyang rules: Ignore the ugly truths that discredit the powers that be.
Self-immolation is a weapon of the weak, an assertion of moral authority in the face of authoritarian power, a last-resort demonstration of defiance normally confined to despotic states. Like in Tibet, where more than 130 people have set themselves on fire since 2009 to protest Chinese repression, cultural chauvinism and economic exploitation. Or like in Tunisia at the end of 2010, where a street vendor’s fiery protest sparked a national revolution against tyranny that inspired the Arab Spring. But a Japan Spring seems unlikely even as protests mount against Abe’s ideological agenda and moves to circumvent democracy through the special secrets law, the evisceration of Article 9 and restarting nuclear reactors in defiance of majority opinion.
Abe’s move to bulldoze through a reinterpretation of Article 9 of the Constitution to allow for collective self-defense is opposed by most Japanese. But he is getting his way by making a mockery of Japanese democracy in bypassing established procedures for amending the Constitution. Abe is like a thief in the night sneaking in the back door to steal the heart and soul of Japan’s pacifist Constitution, and this is what angers people. The absence of any substantive public consultation and the failure to pursue revision through the front door by securing Diet approval and holding a public referendum — procedures laid out in the Constitution — raises serious questions about Abe’s commitment to democratic principles and the sugarcoated militarism he touts as “proactive pacifism.”
This artful reinterpretation is a game changer and everyone knows it, because now Japan can wage war. Abe is frog-marching the nation down what everyone understands is a slippery slope. What may start as a limited action to protect allies can easily escalate out of control while the fog of war obscures the exit sign.
The various scenarios that the Liberal Democratic Party trotted out to convince New Komeito, its coalition partner, to abandon its core principle of pacifism provide useful political cover, but are unconvincing in the court of public opinion. Soka Gakkai, the lay Buddhist organization that mobilizes millions of votes for the coalition, warned New Komeito, its political offshoot, not to endorse reinterpretation, sensibly advising Abe to pursue revision through proper constitutional means rather than devious ploys. But New Komeito signed off on this dubious dodging of democratic process, apparently unwilling to relinquish the whiff of power even if it entails shirking its principles. But the once formidable Socialist Party (now the tiny Social Democratic Party) knows all too well the cost of abandoning core principles for the vagaries of political power. In a bizarre coalition including the LDP, the Socialist leader Tomiichi Murayama became prime minister (1994-96), but the price of power was renouncing the party’s long-standing view that the security pact with the United States was unconstitutional. The price of this apostasy was the implosion of the Socialist Party, as members voted with their feet and left the party in droves.
New Komeito’s leaders are hoping that they can convince members that their apostasy is really a pragmatic adjustment that actually imposes limits on Japan’s use of force. Good luck with that. Chances are that the religious basis of Soka Gakkai will insulate New Komeito from an exodus, but time will tell. Members I spoke with feel betrayed and resent the party’s flip-flop on pacifism, and a backlash is certainly possible.
The bottom line is that the Japanese public thinks that Abe is more of a threat to Japan than China or North Korea. Advocates justify reinterpreting the Constitution because Japan lives in a dangerous neighborhood, with China militarizing its territorial disputes and Pyongyang punctuating bellicose rhetoric by launching missiles. But even as the Japanese public understands these threats it appears that by a vast margin it fears Abe even more and doesn’t want to hand him a blank check on security.
Essentially, the public doesn’t trust Abe to prudently exercise the right to collective self-defense and is worried that he or some successor will somehow drag the nation into war somewhere, sometime at Washington’s behest. Once the principle is adopted, all of those reassuring scenarios the LDP has conjured up over the past month suggesting that some shackles remain on Japan waging war will fade into oblivion. Team Abe’s political theater over reinterpreting the constitution has not managed to convince anyone who was not already convinced of the wisdom of doing so. Sophistry aside, Abe wants to unleash the nation’s formidable military forces, and this is what the public opposes.
Japanese pacifism and Article 9 are touchstones of national identity that reflect the prevailing norms and values that Abe is trampling. Students learn about the horrors of war in their textbooks, focusing mainly on the dreadful wartime suffering of the Japanese population. Many also visit Hiroshima and Okinawa on school trips, where they encounter graphic antiwar messages that bolster support for Japan’s war-renouncing Constitution.
Last year the box office hit about kamikaze, “Eien no Zero (The Eternal Zero),” delivered a powerful antiwar message, as the protagonist tried to subvert the war effort and what he dismissed as an inhumane waste of young men’s lives on suicide missions that would have no bearing on the outcome of a war already lost. The hard-core militarists in the film are portrayed as raving sociopaths.
Abe is said to have liked the film, but did he get it?
July 1, 2014, will go down in history as a watershed in Japan’s postwar history, the day of infamy when Abe hijacked democracy by renouncing Article 9 and the nation’s pacifist postwar order in an unscrupulous manner, achieving by fiat what he didn’t dare try through established constitutional procedures. Apparently he fears the people as much as they fear him.
Jeff Kingston is the director of Asian Studies, Temple University Japan.
The incident took place on a bridge at the busy Shinjuku station in central Tokyo
A man set himself on fire in central Tokyo in protest at a proposed law which could allow Japan to deploy its military overseas.
The man was taken to hospital after being hosed down but his condition was not immediately known, officials said.
Japan's government could make the change to its pacifist constitution as early as next Tuesday.
The US-drafted constitution bans war and "the threat or use of force" to settle international disputes.
Witnesses said the middle-aged man, wearing a suit and tie, climbed onto a pedestrian bridge at Tokyo's Shinjuku station.
"He was sitting cross-legged and was just talking, so I thought it would end without incident," one eyewitness told Reuters. "Then all of a sudden his body was enveloped in fire."
Reports said the man used a megaphone to shout for over an hour about the change to Japan's constitution.
Video shown on national television in Japan showed the flames being extinguished by officers. 'Double standard'
Japan has well-equipped and well-trained armed forces but there are severe restrictions on them being deployed abroad.
Under Article 9 of its post-war pacifist constitution, Japan is blocked from the use of force to resolve conflicts except in the case of self-defence.
Mr Abe has said Japan must change to adapt to a new security environment
But Japan's Prime Minister Shinzo Abe says he wants a new interpretation of the constitution to be agreed on.
The move has split opinion inside the country. Critics of the move warn against what they see as increasing militarism, while conservatives argue that the restriction is a double standard forced upon Japan.
Mr Abe's plan has led to criticism from China, whose relations with the Japan have become strained over territorial disputes in East China Sea.
Correspondents say the move will likely please the US, with whom Japan has a long-standing security treaty.
Investigators and firefighters work at the scene where a man has set himself on fire, on a pedestrian walkway at Tokyo's busy Shinjuku railway station, Sunday, June 29, 2014. Photo: AP
TOKYO — A man set himself on fire at Tokyo’s busy Shinjuku railway station on Sunday in what appears to be a rare violent political protest.
The man, who appeared in his 50s or 60s, was taken to the hospital after suffering serious injuries, said Daiji Kubota, an officer at the Shinjuku police station. He said the man’s identity and the reason for the self-immolation was under investigation.
Footage of the incident on Twitter and other social media showed a man clad in a suit and tie sitting on a small mat along the metal framework above a pedestrian walkway with two plastic bottles of what looked like gasoline beside him.
Witnesses were quoted as saying the man spoke through a megaphone to protest the government’s moves to change Japan’s defense policy, doused himself with gasoline and set himself alight as hundreds of people watched from below and from nearby buildings.
Television reports showed firefighters pulling the man down onto the pedestrian bridge walkway and using hoses and a fire extinguisher to put out the fire before loading the victim into an ambulance.
Japan’s Cabinet is expected on Tuesday to approve a proposal calling for the right to “collective self-defense,” which would allow Japan to play a more assertive role in international security amid China’s growing military presence and rising regional tensions. Japan currently limits its participation even in U.N. peacekeeping activities to noncombat roles.
Critics say the shift undermines the war-renouncing Article 9 of Japan’s Constitution, and opposition groups have staged constant but peaceful protests outside Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s official residence.
Japan has had very few self-immolations in past decades despite a long history of suicides by ritual disembowelment, or seppuku, dating back to the feudal era. The most high-profile suicide for political reasons in the modern era was by Yukio Mishima, a right-wing author considered to be one of Japan’s greatest novelists, who killed himself in front of the headquarters of Japan’s Self Defense Forces in 1970 after an unsuccessful coup attempt.
WARNING: The video below is graphic and extremely disturbing.
A man set himself on fire in the centre of Tokyo on Sunday, apparently in protest against prime minister Shinzo Abe’s plans to loosen rules on how Japan’s military can be deployed.
The self-immolation, in full view of shoppers in the busy district of Shinjuku, came as Mr Abe’s party is nearing a deal with its coalition partner, the Buddhist-affiliated party Komeito, to approve a proposal that would allow Japan to play a more assertive role in international security.
Under the proposal, known as “collective self-defence”, Japan would be allowed to join allies in battle even in the absence of a direct threat to its own territory. Mr Abe has argued that the move is needed amid conflicts in the South China Sea that have pitted China against Vietnam and the Philippines, mentioning them alongside Japan’s stand-off with China over islands in the East China Sea.
Yet polls suggest that more than half of Japanese people are opposed to the move, which Mr Abe has described as a “reinterpretation” of the country’s pacifist constitution, rather than an amendment which would require two-thirds approval from both houses of parliament and then a national referendum. That has angered critics who argue that Mr Abe is forcing through a fundamental shift in Japan’s military posture, one that has been maintained more or less unaltered since the second world war.
The protest on Sunday came after days of demonstrations outside Mr Abe’s residence. According to online footage and witness reports, the man sat cross-legged on the girders of a pedestrian footbridge near the south exit of Shinjuku station, and spoke for about an hour through a megaphone against Mr Abe’s plans.
As firefighters began to scale the frame of the bridge just after 2pm, the man doused himself in what appeared to be petrol and set himself alight. He was then pulled on to mattresses below, hosed down and carried away to hospital.
A spokesman for Shinjuku police said the man’s injuries were serious, but not life threatening. He said the man appeared to be aged about 60.
Investigators and firefighters at the site where a man set himself on fire at the Shinjuku railway station in Tokyo on Sunday. Credit Kyodo News, via Associated Press
TOKYO — In a ghastly spectacle of a sort rarely seen in this orderly city, a man set himself on fire in front of horrified crowds at Tokyo’s busiest train station on Sunday in what appeared to be a lone protest against efforts to weaken Japan’s antiwar Constitution.
The police provided few details about the man, who survived with burns all over his body after being rushed to a Tokyo hospital. Firefighters appeared either to have been warned or to have discerned the man’s intentions, because they were on hand to douse him quickly with water once he set himself on fire with a liquid that looked like gasoline.
The self-immolation took place in broad daylight in front of hundreds of onlookers, who used cellphones and other devices to post graphic videos and photos of it on social media sites.
The images show a thin, middle-aged man in a dark suit who sat cross-legged atop the scaffolding of a pedestrian bridge in front of the busy Shinjuku train station.
At first, he used a megaphone to speak to gathering crowds.
While there is no audio with most of the images, several postings said the man told the crowd that he opposed efforts by Prime Minister Shinzo Abe to loosen restrictions in the Constitution on the use of military force, which is interpreted as allowing Japan to act only in self-defense.
Mr. Abe has called for a new interpretation that would allow the armed forces also to contribute to the defense of allied nations under attack, something they cannot now legally do.
While Mr. Abe says Japan needs more robust military alliances to offset the growing might of China, opponents on the left have staged small street protests to warn that the change could embroil Japan in distant, American-led wars.
After making his appeal, the man then suddenly set himself on fire. One video, shot from a window overlooking the bridge, showed the man engulfed in yellow flames while he sat cross-legged, as if meditating.
Firefighters, who were waiting below, quickly sprayed him with their hoses.
One rescuer then clambered up to knock the still-burning man off the scaffolding and onto the center of the bridge in front of firefighters, who doused him for several seconds before treating him.
Investigators and firefighters work at the scene where a man has set himself on fire, on a pedestrian walkway at Tokyo’s busy Shinjuku railway station, Sunday, June 29, 2014. A man set himself on fire at the station on Sunday in an apparent political protest. The man, who appeared in his 50s or 60s, was taken to the hospital after suffering serious injuries, said an officer at the Shinjuku police station. He said the reason for the self-immolation was under investigation. (Kyodo News/Associated Press)
By Associated Press June 29
TOKYO — A man set himself on fire at Tokyo’s busy Shinjuku railway station on Sunday in what appears to be a rare violent political protest.
The man, who appeared in his 50s or 60s, was taken to the hospital after suffering serious injuries, said Daiji Kubota, an officer at the Shinjuku police station. He said the man’s identity and the reason for the self-immolation was under investigation.
Footage of the incident on Twitter and other social media showed a man clad in a suit and tie sitting on a small mat along the metal framework above a pedestrian walkway with two plastic bottles of what looked like gasoline beside him.
Witnesses were quoted as saying the man spoke through a megaphone to protest the government’s moves to change Japan’s defense policy, doused himself with gasoline and set himself alight as hundreds of people watched from below and from nearby buildings.
Television reports showed firefighters pulling the man down onto the pedestrian bridge walkway and using hoses and a fire extinguisher to put out the fire before loading the victim into an ambulance.
Japan’s Cabinet is expected on Tuesday to approve a proposal calling for the right to “collective self-defense,” which would allow Japan to play a more assertive role in international security amid China’s growing military presence and rising regional tensions. Japan currently limits its participation even in U.N. peacekeeping activities to noncombat roles.
Critics say the shift undermines the war-renouncing Article 9 of Japan’s Constitution, and opposition groups have staged constant but peaceful protests outside Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s official residence.
Japan has had very few self-immolations in past decades despite a long history of suicides by ritual disembowelment, or seppuku, dating back to the feudal era. The most high-profile suicide for political reasons in the modern era was by Yukio Mishima, a right-wing author considered to be one of Japan’s greatest novelists, who killed himself in front of the headquarters of Japan’s Self Defense Forces in 1970 after an unsuccessful coup attempt.
Protest comes as Japanese prime minister pushes for broader defense in face of a rising China and volatile North Korea June 29, 2014 10:05AM ET
A man in Japan set himself on fire at a busy intersection in Tokyo on Sunday in an apparent protest against Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's plans to broaden Japan’s military capabilities, police and witnesses said.
Authorities hosed down the unidentified man and carried him away, according to witness accounts and pictures posted to social media. It was not immediately clear whether he survived.
Japan is poised for a historic shift in its defense policy by ending a ban that has kept the military from fighting abroad since World War II. Abe's cabinet could adopt a resolution as early as Tuesday revising a long-standing interpretation of the constitution in order to lift the ban.
According to witnesses and social media posts, the man appeared to be wearing a suit, glasses and a tie. He sat atop a pedestrian bridge and spoke through a megaphone to protest plans to end a ban on exercising “collective self-defense,” or aiding a friendly country under attack.
A police spokeswoman confirmed the incident, which took place near bustling Shinjuku station, but would not provide further details.
Ryuichiro Nakatsu, an 18-year-old student, said, “he was sitting cross legged and was just talking, so I thought it would end without incident. But when I came back to the same place 30 minutes later, he was still there. Then all of a sudden his body was enveloped in fire.”
“He was yelling against the government, about collective self-defense,” he said.
After World War II and during its occupation of Japan, the U.S. government drafted a constitution aimed at declawing a power that had just several years before swept across swaths of East Asia and Polynesia.
The planned change in defense strategy marks a major step away from U.S.-imposed post-War War II pacifism and widens Japan's military options. Under its constitution the country has had a limited, non-combatant role as part of the U.S.-led occupation of Iraq, and in peacekeeping operations.
Although Japan still boasts modern military equipment today, it can’t use it under the agreement.
Japanese conservatives say the constitution war-renouncing Article 9 has excessively restricted Japan's ability to defend itself. They also argue that a changing regional power balance — including a rising China — means Japan's security policies must be more flexible.
The move will likely rile an increasingly assertive Beijing, whose already delicate ties with Japan have chilled due to a maritime dispute, mutual mistrust and the legacy of Japan's past military aggression. Washington will welcome the move, having long urged Japan to become a more equal partner in the alliance between the two countries.
Since the end of World War II, the United States has maintained a strong military presence in Japan, tasked with protecting the country from international adversaries. The arrangement is costly for the U.S., which has seen its forces stretched thin over the last decade by wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Japan began its first military expansion at the western end of its island chain in more than 40 years in April, breaking ground on a radar station on a tropical island off Taiwan. The move risks angering China, locked in a dispute with Japan over nearby islands, which they both claim.
ディ・ヴェルト（ドイツ）
以下、独紙ディ・ヴェルト（ Die Welt）の29.06.14付け記事（2014年6月29日付け、欧州の殆どの国は年月日ではなく日月年の順）。 表題は「Selbstverbrennung gegen Japans Re-Militarisierung 日本再軍備に反対する焼身自殺 」。記事末尾赤字の部分でNHKを批判してます（翻訳しておきました）。
Der nationalistische Premierminister Shinzo Abe will die Verfassung neu interpretieren, um den militärischen Spielraum Japans zu erweitern. Sein Volk ist dagegen. Ein Bürger protestierte nun radikal.
Von Sonja Blaschke, Tokio
Foto: AP Er kletterte auf ein Brückengeländer und wetterte per Megafon gegen die Neuinterpretation der Verfassung. Dann setzte sich der etwa 50- bis 60-jährige Mann in Brand. Polizei und Feuerwehr, hier im Einsatz, konnten ihn knapp retten
Ein Mann in den Fünfzigern hat sich am Sonntagnachmittag vor Hunderten Passanten an einem belebten Tokioter Bahnhof selbst in Brand gesetzt. Augenzeugenberichten zufolge hatte er zuvor eine Stunde lang per Megafon gegen die Politik von Premierminister Shinzo Abe gewettert, der eine Neuinterpretation der japanischen Verfassung durchsetzen will. Sie würde Japan das Recht zur kollektiven Selbstverteidigung geben und damit den pazifistischen Charakter der Verfassung infrage stellen. Medienberichten zufolge soll der Mann mit schweren Verletzungen überlebt haben. Kurz nach dem Vorfall begannen Fotos und Videos davon auf Twitter und Facebook zu kursieren.
Gegen 13 Uhr war der in einen grauen Anzug gekleidete unscheinbare Mann auf das Geländer eines Fußgängerübergangs zwischen zwei Kaufhäusern geklettert. Dort setzte er sich in den Schneidersitz, ein Megafon vor sich, eine Tasche und zwei Plastikflaschen neben sich. "Da sitzt ein seltsamer Typ am Südausgang von Shinjuku", twitterte jemand. Mehrere Passanten beschwerten sich über den "Idioten", dessentwegen der Südausgang von Shinjuku, einer der belebtesten Pendelbahnhöfe Tokios, bald von Polizei abgeriegelt wurde. "Wie lästig", regten sich mehrere online auf. "Der sagt irgendwas mit dem Megafon, was keiner versteht", schrieb ein anderer. Viele vermuteten in den Plastikflaschen Alkohol und glaubten, der Mann sei betrunken.
Auf einmal ging alles ganz schnell. Polizei und Feuerwehr waren schon vor Ort, konnten aber nicht verhindern, dass sich der Mann mit Brennstoff übergoss und mit einem Feuerzeug anzündete. Augenzeugen stellten Bilder des Brennenden ins Internet, manche waren von Kaffeetischen aus im Kaufhaus darüber aufgenommen worden. Helfer versuchten noch, ihn mit Wasser aus Feuerwehrschläuchen zu löschen. Dann stürzte er von der Brücke in die Tiefe. Beim Transport ins Krankenhaus soll er bei Bewusstsein gewesen sein und mit schweren Verbrennungen überlebt haben. Über seine Identität ist bisher nichts bekannt.
Im Streit mit China tritt Abe robuster auf
Augenzeugen berichten, wie er die japanische Regierung dafür kritisierte, Japan die "Ausübung des Rechts auf kollektive Selbstverteidigung" zu ermöglichen. Dadurch soll das japanische Militär mehr Spielraum erhalten, und anders als bisher auch Verbündete im Angriffsfall verteidigen dürfen. Dies verhinderte bisher der Artikel 9 der pazifistischen Verfassung Japans, die seit 1947 gültig ist. Die Mehrheit der Bevölkerung steht den Vorhaben Abes kritisch gegenüber. Trotzdem will die von der liberaldemokratischen Partei geführte Regierung am Dienstag formell die Uminterpretation von Artikel 9 im Kabinett beschließen. Nach langen Diskussionen hatte man sich zuvor mit dem skeptischen Koalitionspartner, der Neuen Gerechtigkeitspartei, auf eine Formulierung geeinigt.
Beobachter vermuten, dass Abe Japan stärker aufrüsten möchte. Er ist für seine nationalistischen Töne bekannt und provozierte China im Inselstreit unter anderem mit dem Besuch des Yasukuni-Schreins, wo auch Kriegsverbrecher des Zweiten Weltkriegs verehrt werden. Dies hatte seit mehr als zehn Jahren kein japanischer Premier mehr getan. Im Konflikt um die Senkaku-Inseln, die in China Diaoyu heißen, sieht sich Japan immer offensiveren Auftreten der chinesischen Luftwaffe und Marine gegenüber. Abe beantwortet Provokationen robuster als seine Vorgänger. Hardliner in Japan fordern eine Aufrüstung bis hin zur atomaren Bewaffnung. Bisher ist dies aber in dem Land der Atombombenabwürfe von Hiroshima und Nagasaki ein weitverbreitetes Tabu.
Selbstverbrennungen sind in Japan extrem selten. Trotzdem verzichtete der öffentlich-rechtliche Fernsehsender NHK auf einen Bericht darüber in den Hauptnachrichten um 19 Uhr Ortszeit, also fünf Stunden nach dem Vorfall. An der Neutralität des Senders kamen in den letzten Monaten immer mehr Zweifel auf. Er wird seit einem halben Jahr von einem Mann geführt, der von Premierminister Abe persönlich ausgesucht wurde.
A man in Japan set himself on fire at a busy intersection in Tokyo on Sunday in an apparent protest against Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's plans to ease limits of the country's pacifist constitution, police and witnesses said. Japan is poised for a historic shift in its defense policy by ending a ban that has kept the military from fighting abroad since World War II.
It was not immediately clear whether the man survived.
Abe's cabinet is expected to adopt as early as Tuesday a resolution revising a long-standing interpretation of the US-drafted constitution to lift the ban after his ruling party finalizes an agreement with its junior partner.
A police spokeswoman confirmed the incident, which took place near bustling Shinjuku station, but would not provide further details. Witnesses said the man, seated on pedestrian bridge, used a megaphone to protest plans to end a ban on exercising "collective self-defense", or aiding a friendly country under attack.
"He was sitting cross legged and was just talking, so I thought it would end without incident. But when I came back to the same place 30 minutes later, he was still there. Then all of a sudden his body was enveloped in fire," said Ryuichiro Nakatsu, an 18-year-old student who witnessed the incident.
"He was yelling against the government, about collective self-defense," he said.
Witnesses said the man was hosed down and carried away.
The planned change in defense strategy marks a major step away from post-war pacifism and widens Japan's military options.
Conservatives say the charter's war-renouncing Article 9 has excessively restricted Japan's ability to defend itself and that a changing regional power balance including a rising China means Japan's security policies must be more flexible.
The change will likely rile China, whose ties with Japan have chilled due to a maritime row, mutual mistrust and the legacy of Japan's past military aggression, but will be welcomed by Tokyo's ally Washington, which has long urged Japan to become a more equal partner in the alliance.
East Japan Railway Co. plans to move the platform of Iidabashi Station on its Chuo Line in central Tokyo to reduce safety risks for passengers ahead of the 2020 Olympics.
The station, in Chiyoda Ward, is built on a curve, causing gaps as wide as 33 cm to form between the train and the platform. Passengers have stepped into the gaps accidentally, causing some to fall.
JR East said it will fix the problem in time for the Tokyo Olympics by moving the platform to the west by 200 meters.
The station will undergo major renovations, the company said, including work on the station building and areas outside of it.
Tokyo Metro: Woman Falls Onto Tracks And Is Mistaken For Bag, Station Worker Signals Train To Leave Without Checking, Woman Takes Shelter Under Track, Escapes Safely
On June 10, Tokyo Metro announced that on the evening of June 9 a woman who looked to be in her 20s fell onto the tracks at the Hibiya Line Roppongi Station, however the male station worker (20) overseeing the platform assumed that a bag had fallen, and allowed the train to depart without checking the tracks. The woman escaped to the space beneath the platform, and was unharmed.
According to Tokyo Metro, at around 9:25pm on June 9, when the woman had tried to get on the train she fell into the 25cm gap between the train and the platform edge. A woman accompanying her shouted “[she’s] fallen” in a loud voice, but without checking the station worker assumed that a bag had fallen onto the track. He explained to this woman that he would “pick it up afterwards” and indicated to the train to depart.
After the train had departed, the station worker brought a grabber and asked the woman “Where did it fall?”, when the woman replied “It was a person who fell”.
The station worker had joined Tokyo Metro in April, and had been posted at Roppongi station for around one and a half months.
Tokyo Metro statement: We offer our deepest apologies. We will thoroughly instruct the station worker involved.
TOKYO — Tokyo Metro Co, which operates eight subway lines in Tokyo, said Tuesday that a newly-hired station employee has been removed from duty after he allowed a train to leave Roppongi Station even though a woman had fallen onto the tracks.
According to a Fuji TV report, the female passenger fell into a 25-cm gap between the train and the platform at around 9:30 p.m. on Sunday at Roppongi Station on the Hibiya line. The victim’s friend called to the station official to alert him that she had fallen, but the official in question reportedly misunderstood the call and thought that someone’s personal belongings had fallen onto the track. He then authorized the train to leave the station.
Tokyo Metro said the woman was not knocked unconscious during her fall, and was therefore able to make her own way to an emergency shelter area beneath the platform and wait for the train to leave the station. Police say the woman was not injured during the incident.
Fuji TV said the official in question started the job in April this year. A Tokyo Metro spokesman was quoted as saying that he failed properly to confirm that conditions for departure were safe before allowing the train to leave the station. Tokyo Metro said it is considering how best to discipline him.
です。
最近のコメント